Why Arvind Kejriwal is unable to vote but Amritpal Singh is allowed to run for office



The intersection of law, politics, and democracy often presents intriguing paradoxes, and India's electoral system is no exception. The ongoing Lok Sabha election of 2024 has brought one such paradox to the forefront, highlighting the divergent experiences of two individuals incarcerated in distant prisons.

In this unfolding narrative, we encounter Amritpal Singh, the leader of 'Waris Punjab De,' currently held in a jail in Assam's Dibrugarh, and Arvind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi, confined in Tihar Jail. Despite their contrasting circumstances, both figures are intertwined by the electoral process, revealing a striking irony.

Amritpal Singh, a Khalistan sympathizer detained under the National Security Act since April 23, 2023, is set to contest the Lok Sabha polls from Punjab’s Khadoor Sahib constituency as an Independent candidate. His decision to enter the political arena from behind bars underscores the curious juxtaposition of criminal accusations and democratic participation.

In stark contrast, Arvind Kejriwal, an elected representative, finds himself deprived of the basic right to vote while in custody. Despite his status as the Chief Minister of Delhi, Kejriwal remains unable to exercise his franchise, emblematic of the disenfranchisement experienced by countless undertrials across the country.

The electoral landscape of India has previously witnessed similar paradoxes, with notable instances of incarcerated individuals contesting and even winning elections from jail. Mukhtar Ansari, the notorious don-turned-politician, secured victory in Uttar Pradesh's Mau Assembly seat multiple times while imprisoned. Similarly, Lalu Prasad Yadav, embroiled in the fodder scam case, emerged triumphant in Bihar's Madhepura Lok Sabha constituency from behind bars.

However, while the law permits individuals facing charges to stand for elections, it precludes them from casting their votes while in lawful custody. This glaring incongruity is encapsulated in Section 62(5) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which prohibits individuals detained in police custody or confined in prison from voting in any election.

Amidst these legal intricacies and electoral peculiarities, the dichotomy between contesting and voting rights underscores the complexities of India's democratic framework. As the Lok Sabha election unfolds, it serves as a poignant reminder of the nuanced interplay between law, politics, and individual liberties in the world's largest democracy.


buttons=(Accept !) days=(20)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. Learn More
Accept !