This incident at Microsoft’s Build event highlights growing internal dissent related to the company’s perceived role in geopolitical conflicts, particularly the Israel-Palestine situation. Here’s a clear summary of what happened and the broader context:
-
“Satya, how about you show how Microsoft is killing Palestinians?”
-
“How about you show how Israeli war crimes are powered by Azure?”
He was immediately removed from the event.
-
A refusal to stay silent about what he called Microsoft’s facilitation of “ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people.”
-
Criticism of Microsoft’s recent internal review and third-party audit claiming no evidence of misuse of Azure or AI technologies in the Gaza conflict. Lopez described this as a “non-transparent audit” that gave him no relief.
-
Highlighting Microsoft’s admission that the Israel Ministry of Defense has “special access” to its technologies, questioning the nature and extent of that access.
-
Stating that the world witnesses alleged crimes “live on the internet every day” and accusing a top Azure customer of committing crimes against humanity.
-
Warning that boycotts against Microsoft may increase and damage the company’s reputation if it does not take action.
-
Last month, Vaniya Agrawal, an Indian-origin employee, confronted Microsoft leadership at their 50th anniversary event, accusing the company of backing Israel’s “automated apartheid and genocide systems” through Azure and AI technologies.
-
The day before Agrawal’s protest, another engineer, Ibtihal Aboussad, interrupted a Microsoft AI event during Mustafa Suleyman’s speech with the words “Mustafa, shame on you.”
Why this matters
-
These protests expose tensions inside major tech firms over ethical responsibilities related to the geopolitical use of their technologies.
-
Microsoft, as a leading cloud and AI provider, is under pressure both internally and externally to address concerns about how its technology is being deployed, especially in sensitive conflict zones.
-
Employee activism is increasingly influencing corporate policies and public perception in the tech sector.