Pakistan's own history and its jihadist illusions

This article is a scathing critique of Pakistan’s repeated attempts to invoke religious ideology—particularly Islamic jihadism—as a tool of statecraft against India. It argues that Pakistan's historical and current militaristic fantasies, like the recent so-called operation Bunyan-un-Marsoos, are rooted in a mediaeval delusion and an obsessive hostility toward India, rather than any strategic or moral clarity. The key themes and arguments in this commentary include:

1. Historical Myopia and Religious Symbolism:
   Pakistan's military operations are repeatedly named after Islamic historical conquests (e.g., Operation Gibraltar, General Tariq), reflecting a fixation with mediaeval Islamic imperialism. The article argues this has led to dangerous militarization of religious sentiment, targeting not only India but also Indian Muslims and regional neighbors.

2. Failed Expectations and Misreading of Indian Society:
   Pakistan has consistently misjudged India's internal fabric, especially its Muslim and Sikh communities. Examples like Brigadier Mohammad Usman, Param Vir Chakra Abdul Hamid, and Sikh commanders in the 1947–48 war are used to illustrate how Indian soldiers of all faiths have defended the nation against Pakistani aggression.

3. The Collapse of the Two-Nation Theory:
   The author derides Pakistan’s foundational ideology, claiming its practical outcomes—such as the secession of Bangladesh and alienation from Afghanistan—prove the theory's failure. Pakistan's brutal repression of Bengalis during Operation Searchlight and its duplicitous role in Afghanistan are cited as evidence of its moral and strategic failures.

4. Contemporary Propaganda and International Image:
   Pakistan’s recent efforts, including false claims of Indian attacks and calls for jihad beyond its borders, are portrayed as desperate attempts to stay relevant. The article suggests that only China’s support prevents Pakistan from becoming a total pariah.

5. Criticism of Pakistan's State Structure:
   The commentary calls Pakistan a "failed state" plagued by internal rebellions, an unsustainable economy, and international disrepute. The Lahore-centric political elite is accused of ignoring the rest of the country, fueling separatist sentiments in provinces like Balochistan.

6. Irony and Delusion:
   Perhaps the article’s sharpest barb is its depiction of Pakistan as a nation trapped in a cycle of self-inflicted delusion—dreaming of religious conquests and regional revolts while being economically and politically fractured.

Tone and Style:

The tone is unapologetically caustic, nationalistic, and laden with rhetorical flourishes. Historical references are used strategically to paint Pakistan as both delusional and dangerous. The author's core message is that India must remain vigilant, but Pakistan’s actions stem from weakness and not strength.