The Supreme Court’s recent condemnation of the Bengal Police in the 2021 post-poll violence case starkly exposes deep issues of law enforcement bias and political interference in the state. The Court’s observations during the May 30 hearing reveal a disturbing sequence of events where police failed in their primary duty to protect citizens and uphold justice.
The case involved a brutal attack on a BJP supporter’s family, where 40-50 armed assailants vandalized their home, assaulted the wife by forcibly undressing and sexually abusing her, and subjected her to extreme trauma — only escaping after threatening self-immolation. Yet, instead of prompt action, the local officer refused to register an FIR, pressuring the family to leave their village “for their safety.” This dereliction of duty clearly reflects a pattern of police complicity or fear of political influence, as highlighted by the Court.
By setting aside the Calcutta High Court’s bail order for six Trinamool Congress cadres accused of the crime, the Supreme Court underscored the gravity of the offense — terming it a calculated act to “terrorize members of the opposite political party” and “wreak vengeance.” The bench condemned the attack as an assault on democracy’s very foundations, aimed at intimidating political opponents through fear and violence.
Importantly, the Court pointed out that the FIR was only registered after the High Court’s directive in August 2021, following which the CBI took over investigations. This delay, allegedly due to the accused’s political clout, highlights systemic obstacles to a fair trial and justice. The Supreme Court’s decision to cancel bail was driven by the concern that politically influential accused could influence the trial’s outcome.
The Court’s strong reprimand of the Bengal Police, highlighting their behavior as reinforcing fears of local power imbalances, signals a demand for accountability and reform. It directed the state’s Home Secretary and DGP to ensure protection for the complainant and witnesses so they can participate in the trial without fear, emphasizing that any failure to do so would attract the Court’s direct intervention.
This case starkly illustrates the dangers of politicization of law enforcement in India’s democratic fabric, especially in volatile political environments like post-election Bengal. The Supreme Court’s stern stance sends a message that justice must transcend political loyalties, safeguarding the rights and dignity of all citizens — especially those vulnerable to targeted violence.
