Five lessons to be learned from Ukraine's spectacular strike on Pearl Harbor


On June 1, 2025, Ukraine launched one of the most audacious and far-reaching special forces-style drone operations in modern military history. Codenamed "Operation Spiderweb," this coordinated drone offensive targeted strategic Russian airbases across thousands of kilometers, resulting in the confirmed destruction or disabling of 41 Russian aircraft, including Tu-95 and Tu-22M3 strategic bombers, as well as A-50 airborne radar planes. This attack has been hailed as a turning point in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, now in its fourth year.

Operational Scope and Execution

The Ukrainian Security Service (SBU), in coordination with the country’s drone forces, planned this operation over 18 months. It involved the deployment of 117 long-range kamikaze drones, each pre-programmed to strike designated targets across the Russian Federation. Remarkably, the drones were launched from inside Russia itself—hidden within civilian infrastructure such as modified trucks, barns, and sheds. This use of deep-cover drone nests allowed Ukraine to bypass Russian radar systems and air defenses.

The key targets were two major air bases: Olenya Air Base in Murmansk and Belaya Air Base in Irkutsk—more than 6,000 kilometers apart, located across three time zones. According to multiple intelligence and defense sources, the operation resulted in a loss of over one-third of Russia's strategic bomber fleet, significantly degrading Moscow's long-range strike capabilities. The economic cost to Russia is estimated to be over $7 billion in lost aircraft alone.

Strategic Precision and Symbolism

The timing of the attack is also significant. It came just days before the second round of peace talks between Ukraine and Russia, scheduled in Istanbul on June 2, following a successful prisoner swap during the first round on May 16. This sends a powerful message: Ukraine is capable of strategic reach and technical sophistication, and it can disrupt Russia’s deep military infrastructure even without direct NATO involvement.

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy publicly emphasized that this operation was carried out entirely with Ukrainian resources—without NATO or Western weapons systems such as Taurus missiles. Ukraine released detailed satellite images showing how high-resolution commercial imagery was used to identify and target Russian bombers parked in the open. This clear declaration of ownership serves dual purposes: it demonstrates Ukraine’s operational independence and reduces the risk of a Russian escalation against NATO countries.

Russian Response and Nuclear Tensions

Predictably, the Russian government has reacted furiously. Officials described the attacks as a “Pearl Harbor-style” event—a reference to the 1941 Japanese attack on the U.S. fleet in Hawaii. In retaliation, Russia launched one of its largest combined drone and missile barrages against Ukraine, deploying over 470 Iranian-made Shahed drones and multiple cruise and ballistic missiles. This response came within hours of the Ukrainian strikes and was designed to demonstrate Russia's continued retaliatory capacity.

The attack also rekindles fears of nuclear escalation. Some of the aircraft hit—including the Tu-95—are part of Russia’s nuclear triad. Though none were carrying nuclear weapons at the time, the destruction of such platforms reduces Russia’s strategic deterrence capability. Russian officials have again hinted at a potential nuclear response, and military analysts warn that Moscow may retaliate with conventionally armed hypersonic missiles like the Oreshnik, which cannot currently be intercepted by existing air defense systems.

The New Era of Drone Warfare

This event underscores the undeniable fact that drone warfare has fully come of age. If the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict and Houthi attacks on Saudi oil infrastructure in the past decade hinted at the potential of drones, Ukraine’s Operation Spiderweb confirms that drones are now central to 21st-century combat strategy.

Both Ukraine and Russia are deploying thousands of First Person View (FPV) drones—some guided by wires to resist jamming—creating digital minefields and "drone walls" that prevent traditional maneuvers. These developments have led to trench warfare scenarios reminiscent of World War I, as neither side can move freely on open ground. Warfare has gone underground and autonomous.

Lessons for India and the Global South

The operation carries deep lessons for countries like India. The Indian military has made growing use of drones, including in Operation Sindoor—an airstrike campaign against Pakistani targets. However, the scale and precision of Ukraine’s strike shows what is possible when drones, intelligence, and strategic planning are perfectly synchronized.

India must prepare for similar asymmetric threats, especially from Pakistan-based state and non-state actors. The 2021 drone attack on Jammu air base, where two quadcopters dropped IEDs, served as an early warning. That attack failed to hit major targets, but it showed that airbases with unprotected aircraft are vulnerable. Satellite imagery and commercially available data make it easy to track parked aircraft, ships, and even submarines.

India must urgently invest in hardened shelters for all aircraft, integrated radar systems, and counter-UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) defense mechanisms. Indigenous drone jammers, directed-energy weapons, and swarm defense protocols are essential. The future battlefield will be won or lost in the skies—not just by pilots, but by lines of code.


 

buttons=(Accept !) days=(20)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. Learn More
Accept !