Kerala Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar launched a strong critique of the CPI(M)-led Left government, targeting its approach to cultural and religious traditions in the state. His remarks came in the context of the recently organised Ayyappa Summit, which has been at the centre of political debate. Speaking with an air of disapproval, the Governor accused the ruling party of being guided primarily by political convenience rather than genuine cultural respect. He argued that individuals who openly oppose practices like Guru Pooja and symbols like Bharat Mata were now posing as Sabarimala devotees, which he suggested was an act of pretence rather than a reflection of true faith.
Addressing the audience at the Navarathri Sargotsavam organised by Kesari Weekly in Kozhikode, Arlekar remarked that authenticity in devotion could only be demonstrated by openly embracing the sanctity, principles, and values associated with such traditions. His comments implied that the Left government’s engagement with the Ayyappa Summit was hollow and motivated by electoral calculations. By framing the issue in this manner, the Governor positioned himself as a defender of cultural integrity in contrast to what he saw as the opportunistic behaviour of the ruling party.
The Governor further elaborated that symbols like Bharat Mata and practices such as Guru Pooja were never intended to serve political purposes. Instead, he described them as integral aspects of Indian identity, embedded in the collective consciousness of the people. He emphasised that these traditions are interwoven with the country’s blood, thought, and spirit, and therefore cannot be reduced to mere political tools. In making this point, Arlekar sought to highlight the timeless and apolitical nature of cultural practices, portraying them as something far larger and more profound than electoral strategies.
Reflecting on recent controversies, Arlekar recalled how some teachers and school principals had approached him with concerns when Guru Pooja faced opposition in educational settings. This ritual, which involves students washing the feet of their teachers as a gesture of respect, has been a subject of debate in Kerala. Expressing his dismay, the Governor questioned how such opposition could arise in a state that prides itself on being one of the most culturally advanced and intellectually vibrant regions of India. He lamented that despite Kerala’s cultural richness, traditions that represent deep-rooted values were being challenged.
In defending his perspective, Arlekar openly acknowledged that his thinking has been shaped by the ideology of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). He presented the RSS not merely as a political or ideological entity but as an organisation committed to nation-building and the strengthening of societal bonds. According to him, the RSS’s emphasis on cultural preservation and national unity stems from a genuine concern for the country’s future, and these ideals deserve to be spread to households across India. His remarks highlighted his belief that cultural traditions and spiritual practices must be safeguarded against what he perceives as attempts to dilute or politicise them.
Through his speech, Governor Arlekar positioned himself as a custodian of cultural heritage and traditions, challenging the Left government’s narrative surrounding religious practices in Kerala. His criticism drew a sharp line between cultural authenticity and political expediency, underscoring his conviction that the preservation of traditions like Guru Pooja and respect for symbols such as Bharat Mata form an essential part of India’s civilisational ethos. In doing so, he framed the debate not simply as a political disagreement, but as a larger struggle over the cultural identity of Kerala and, by extension, the nation.
