Narayana Murthy and Sudha Murty’s decision has reignited debate around Karnataka’s socio-economic and education survey, which aims to assess the status of backward classes for policy planning and welfare measures. Critics argue that the survey, while intended to identify underprivileged groups, has stirred controversy by creating concerns about privacy, data misuse, and perceived coercion. The participation of prominent figures like the Murthys, or their refusal, draws public attention to these issues, highlighting tensions between government initiatives and individual choice.
Government officials have maintained that the survey is crucial for planning educational and social welfare programs. They argue that accurate data will help design schemes tailored for backward classes, addressing gaps in education, employment, and access to government benefits. The state asserts that voluntary participation ensures that citizens’ rights are respected and the confidentiality of personal information is maintained.
Opposition voices and industry leaders have voiced concern that such surveys may divert focus from broader developmental priorities. Mohandas Pai, for instance, criticised the state government for what he described as an overemphasis on caste-based exercises rather than on infrastructure, technology, and employment generation. He contended that the survey, while possibly well-intentioned, risks deepening social divides and distracting from economic growth initiatives.
Despite these debates, officials have clarified that refusal to participate will not attract any penalty or consequence. Surveyors are instructed to respect citizens’ choices and avoid pressuring households. The High Court’s directive reinforces this voluntary nature, ensuring that the survey remains a tool for social assessment rather than an instrument of compulsion or intrusion into private lives.
The incident also underscores broader discussions in India about caste-based surveys and affirmative action policies. While intended to improve equity and inclusivity, these surveys often spark controversy among those who feel they are unnecessary, invasive, or politically motivated. The Murthys’ refusal thus resonates beyond Karnataka, touching on national conversations about privacy, governance, and the balance between social justice and individual rights.
