Key development
-
The Kanpur Lamborghini crash case has shifted after injured complainant Mohammad Taufiq filed an affidavit seeking a settlement.
-
In that affidavit, Taufiq stated that Shivam Mishra was not driving the car at the time of the crash.
-
He instead named Mohan Lal as the driver.
Background of the controversy
-
Police initially registered an FIR against an “unknown driver,” referencing only the Lamborghini.
-
This drew criticism because videos from the scene appeared to show a man being pulled from the driver’s seat.
-
Amid public pressure, Shivam Mishra’s name was later added to the FIR.
Conflicting versions
-
Complainant’s position (new affidavit):
-
Claims Mohan Lal was driving.
-
Requests a compromise/settlement.
-
-
Police position:
-
Maintain that Shivam Mishra was driving.
-
Cite initial findings and material evidence.
-
Viral videos are widely discussed but are not, by themselves, conclusive proof.
-
Judicial status
-
The court has heard arguments and reviewed affidavits and records.
-
The matter is currently at the stage where the court has reserved its order.
-
A final ruling is pending.
Why this matters legally
-
Affidavits from complainants can influence proceedings, especially in cases involving:
-
Identification of the accused
-
Compromise petitions
-
-
However, courts are not bound by private settlements in serious offenses (e.g., reckless driving causing grievous injury); much depends on the charges invoked.
