Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s choice of attire during a dinner hosted for Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Jerusalem became an unexpected talking point, highlighting how fashion often functions as a subtle yet powerful tool of diplomacy. Departing from his usual Western-style suit, Netanyahu appeared in an Indian-style band-collar jacket paired with a white kurta and trousers, a sartorial gesture widely interpreted as a tribute to Indian culture during Modi’s two-day visit. The moment quickly gained attention online after videos of the interaction circulated widely, with observers debating whether the outfit resembled the traditional “Nehru jacket” or the more contemporary “Modi jacket.”
The scene unfolded during an official dinner where the Israeli leader greeted Modi, who himself is known globally for distinctive political fashion, dressed in a chequered vest over a kurta-pyjama ensemble. Netanyahu’s decision to wear Indian attire, and even post about the occasion in Hindi on social media, was seen as a symbolic expression of warmth and camaraderie between the two countries. However, the gesture also sparked a lively debate across social media platforms, with users dissecting the historical and stylistic lineage of the jacket he wore.
The Nehru jacket, commonly associated with India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, traces its origins to traditional garments such as the bandhgala and achkan, which carry Mughal-era influences. Typically sleeveless, hip-length, and featuring a mandarin collar that fastens to the neck, the jacket became internationally recognised during the mid-20th century as a symbol of post-colonial Indian identity and understated elegance. Although Nehru did not invent the garment, his consistent use popularised it worldwide, making it synonymous with diplomatic sophistication and Indian political style.
In contrast, what is popularly referred to today as the “Modi jacket” represents a modern adaptation of the same silhouette. Tailors and fashion brands describe it as slightly longer, more relaxed in fit, and often available in brighter colours or with decorative detailing, reflecting contemporary preferences. The design is considered more versatile and is frequently styled with both traditional and semi-casual outfits, aligning with Narendra Modi’s personal fashion image, which emphasises vibrant textiles and regional craftsmanship.
Despite the debate, many observers argue that the distinction between the two styles is largely semantic rather than structural, as both garments share the same cultural roots. Political figures and commentators have previously weighed in on similar discussions, noting that the garment predates modern political branding and has evolved gradually over time. The conversation surrounding Netanyahu’s outfit therefore reflected not just fashion analysis but also broader political narratives tied to symbolism and identity.
The episode underscored how clothing choices in diplomacy often carry layered meaning beyond aesthetics. Jawaharlal Nehru’s minimalist, swadeshi-inspired wardrobe once projected intellectual refinement and national self-confidence on the global stage, while Narendra Modi’s more colourful and varied attire has been interpreted as promoting Indian craftsmanship and cultural diversity. Netanyahu’s adoption of an Indian-style jacket, regardless of its precise classification, demonstrated how attire can serve as a cultural bridge, reinforcing goodwill and signalling respect during high-level international engagements.
