Iranian military-linked media outlets have publicly challenged claims made by US President Donald Trump regarding a possible agreement involving the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, arguing that his description of the negotiations does not accurately reflect the draft proposal currently under consideration in Iran.
The dispute emerged shortly after Trump announced what he portrayed as significant progress in negotiations with Iran. In public remarks and social media posts, Trump suggested that Tehran was obligated to reopen the Strait of Hormuz without imposing fees or restrictions and claimed that maritime traffic through the strategic waterway was beginning to return to normal.
The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world's most critical energy chokepoints, serving as the transit route for nearly one-fifth of global oil shipments. Any disruption to navigation through the strait can have immediate consequences for international energy markets, shipping costs, and global economic stability.
Before a high-level meeting at the White House concerning developments in West Asia, Trump stated that restrictions on shipping through the Strait of Hormuz had effectively ended. He also claimed that vessels delayed by what he described as an American naval blockade would soon be able to resume normal operations.
In a social media post, Trump asserted that Iran would remove or destroy any remaining naval mines in the area and suggested that maritime traffic could begin returning to normal immediately. He further claimed that no money would be exchanged under the arrangement and indicated that additional issues had also been resolved as part of the broader understanding.
However, Iranian media closely associated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps quickly disputed those assertions. Fars News Agency described Trump's account as "a mix of truth and lies" and argued that it misrepresented the contents of the draft agreement currently being reviewed by Iranian authorities.
According to reports citing senior officials in Tehran, Trump's comments were characterised as an attempt to create the impression of a diplomatic victory before any final agreement had actually been approved. Iranian sources reportedly stated that discussions remain ongoing and that no final decision has yet been made regarding the proposed arrangement.
The draft proposal under discussion has reportedly been described by Iranian officials as a "commitment for commitment" framework. Under this approach, each side would be expected to fulfil specific obligations before additional steps are taken. Iranian sources indicated that the proposal is currently in the final stages of review but has not yet received formal approval.
Iranian officials also rejected Trump's suggestion that Tehran had agreed to reopen the Strait of Hormuz without conditions. According to the reports, no such provision exists in the memorandum currently under consideration. Instead, Iranian authorities reportedly envision reopening the waterway only after any blockade measures are lifted and under arrangements determined by Tehran itself.
Those arrangements could reportedly include monitoring and inspecting vessels, providing maritime services, implementing security measures, and maintaining oversight of shipping activity within the strategic passage. Iranian media emphasised that these conditions remain part of Tehran's position and have not been abandoned.
Another major point of disagreement concerns Iran's nuclear programme. Trump suggested that Iran would either transfer or destroy portions of its nuclear material as part of a broader agreement. However, Iranian media strongly rejected that claim.
According to Fars News Agency, sources familiar with the negotiations stated that there is no provision in the draft memorandum requiring the destruction of Iranian nuclear materials. Iranian officials reportedly described Trump's assertion as completely unfounded and insisted that no such commitment has been made by Tehran.
The reports further indicated that one of Iran's primary demands involves the immediate release of approximately $12 billion in frozen Iranian assets. According to the Iranian account of the negotiations, access to these funds is considered a critical prerequisite before Tehran would agree to move forward with additional phases of discussions.
Iranian sources reportedly stated that negotiations concerning sanctions relief, nuclear issues, and other strategic matters would only proceed after the asset release takes place. The reports suggest that Tehran views the unfreezing of these funds as a test of American willingness to honour any future commitments.
The discussions are also said to involve broader regional issues. According to the Iranian reports, a comprehensive ceasefire in Lebanon consistent with the position of Hezbollah remains an important element of Tehran's negotiating priorities.
Iranian officials reportedly stressed that any final agreement must remain consistent with what they described as the Islamic Republic's "red lines." The reports also reiterated Tehran's longstanding distrust of the United States, suggesting that Iranian decision-makers remain cautious about accepting American commitments without concrete guarantees.
The conflicting statements highlight the significant gap that may still exist between the public narratives presented by Washington and Tehran. While Trump has portrayed the talks as moving toward a major diplomatic breakthrough, Iranian officials continue to emphasise that negotiations remain conditional, unresolved, and subject to approval by the country's leadership.
As discussions continue, the status of the Strait of Hormuz, sanctions relief, frozen assets, nuclear activities, and regional security arrangements remain central issues that could determine whether a final agreement is ultimately reached or whether tensions between the two countries persist.
