ChatGPT has been a prominent topic of discussion in the tech world ever since its debut in November 2022, when it was initially introduced as an AI chatbot capable of delivering responses in a human-like manner. With the introduction of an enhanced version over time, this AI tool has exhibited continual improvement, becoming a versatile tool for various applications. Users have harnessed ChatGPT for tasks such as essay writing, research on diverse subjects, music composition, and even the provision of summaries for their favorite literary works.
However, have you ever contemplated whether the original authors granted OpenAI the requisite permissions to employ their content for training ChatGPT? Chances are, it hasn't crossed your mind. Yet, this is precisely the crux of a legal dispute involving celebrated authors. According to a report from Reuters, a group of renowned authors based in the United States, including Pulitzer Prize winner Michael Chabon, has initiated legal action against OpenAI in federal court in San Francisco. Their claim revolves around the alleged improper use of their writings by OpenAI to train ChatGPT.
The lawsuit, spearheaded by Michael Chabon and supported by playwright David Henry Hwang, as well as authors Matthew Klam, Rachel Louise Snyder, and Ayelet Waldman, contends that OpenAI incorporated their creative works, such as books, plays, and articles, into ChatGPT's training dataset without securing their prior consent. These authors assert that their literary contributions serve as pivotal components in the training regimen of ChatGPT, as they represent exemplars of high-quality, long-form writing.
The authors' argument extends to the claim that ChatGPT possesses the capability to effectively summarize their books and generate text that emulates their distinctive writing style. In light of these allegations, the authors are pressing for punitive measures against OpenAI, including a cessation of what they regard as "unfair business practices," as well as pursuing an unspecified amount of financial restitution for the alleged misappropriation of their intellectual property.
Within their lawsuit, the authors have sought not only monetary damages of an unspecified nature but also a judicial order to prohibit OpenAI from engaging in what they perceive as "unlawful and unfair business practices."
It's noteworthy that this lawsuit is not the first instance of OpenAI facing legal action related to copyright infringement. In July, the well-known comedienne and author Sarah Silverman, along with two other authors, made headlines by filing a lawsuit against OpenAI for purported copyright infringement. Sarah Silverman, the author of "The Bedwetter," asserted that ChatGPT summarily encapsulated the content of her book when prompted, and she had never provided OpenAI with the requisite authorization to utilize her book's content for the training of the chatbot. Similarly, writer Christopher Golden, the author of "Ararat," and author Richard Kadrey, known for "Sandman Slim," also lodged lawsuits against the company, alleging that OpenAI utilized the contents of their respective books without obtaining permission. This trio of authors not only called for a jury trial but also sought financial restitution.
Furthermore, in the same month of July, over 8,500 authors collectively signed an open letter directed at tech companies, urging them to refrain from employing their literary works for the training of AI tools. This coalition of writers, spanning various genres encompassing poetry, fiction, and non-fiction, articulated their concerns regarding generative AI's ability to replicate their language, narratives, writing styles, and ideas without obtaining their explicit consent. They contended that their literary creations essentially serve as the nourishment for AI systems to learn and evolve, and yet, they had not received any form of compensation or acknowledgment for this pivotal role in AI development.
Â
