How the history of India and the United States started in revolution long before Modi and Trump


Long before India and the United States emerged as close strategic partners in the modern era, the two societies shared a series of historical connections shaped by colonialism, war, trade, political ideas, and struggles for self-determination. Although separated by vast oceans and differing circumstances, both regions experienced the influence of the British Empire, creating unexpected links that would gradually evolve into a relationship of greater significance over the centuries.

The story begins in the eighteenth century, when both India and the thirteen American colonies existed under British influence. At the time, the British East India Company was steadily expanding its control over large parts of India, while Britain governed its North American colonies through a system that increasingly generated resentment among settlers. Many colonists became dissatisfied with what they viewed as unfair taxation, restrictive trade regulations, and the absence of political representation in the British Parliament.

One of the most famous events leading to the American Revolution, the Boston Tea Party of 1773, had a direct connection to India. The protest was triggered by legislation that granted the East India Company significant advantages in the tea trade with the American colonies. Colonists viewed the measure as another example of British economic control and exploitation. What began as opposition to taxation and monopolistic practices soon evolved into a broader struggle for independence from British rule.

As tensions between Britain and its American colonies intensified, revolutionary leaders in North America followed developments in India with considerable interest. During the same period, the Kingdom of Mysore,e under the leadership of Hyder A, li was engaged in fierce resistance against British expansion in southern India. For American revolutionaries seeking any development that could weaken Britain, Mysore's military campaigns became a source of fascination and encouragement.

The connection was strengthened by France, which sought to challenge British power across multiple regions following its defeat in the Seven Years' War. French assistance flowed both to the American revolutionaries and to Mysore. As a result, American newspapers and political circles closely monitored Hyder Ali's successes against British forces. Reports of British defeats in India were welcomed by those fighting for independence in North America because they diverted British military resources and attention.

The admiration for Hyder Ali extended beyond simple interest. American revolutionaries viewed Mysore as another front in a global struggle against British imperial power. Historical records indicate that leaders in the revolutionary colonies followed the Anglo-Mysore Wars carefully, seeing Hyder Ali's resistance as beneficial to their own cause. The respect was significant enough that one American vessel was reportedly named after the Mysore ruler, reflecting the symbolic importance he held among some supporters of the American Revolution.

While the American colonies ultimately secured their independence through victory in the Revolutionary War and the signing of the Treaty of Paris in 1783, the consequences for India were less immediate. The newly independent United States established a consular presence in Kolkata in 1792, making it one of America's earliest overseas diplomatic outposts. However, beyond trade and limited commercial interests, India remained largely outside the focus of American foreign policy for much of the nineteenth century.

During this period, American perceptions of India were shaped largely by missionaries, travellers, scholars, and writers. Many visitors portrayed India as a land marked by poverty, illiteracy, and social challenges. At the same time, a growing number of American intellectuals developed an appreciation for India's ancient traditions, philosophical thought, religious teachings, and literary heritage. These competing narratives produced an image of India that was often romanticised, misunderstood, or viewed through an orientalist lens.

Despite limited direct engagement, events within the United States would eventually exert a profound influence on India's economic and political development. One of the most significant examples emerged during the American Civil War between 1861 and 1865.

The conflict between the Union and the Confederacy disrupted global cotton markets because the Southern states, which were major cotton exporters, were unable to supply Britain as they had previously done. Faced with a shortage of cotton for its textile mills, Britain turned increasingly to India as an alternative source.

This sudden demand triggered a cotton boom across western India. Large quantities of Indian cotton flowed to British markets, generating enormous economic activity. Cities such as Mumbai benefited significantly from the surge in trade and investment. The wealth created during this period contributed to the growth of financial institutions and commercial networks that would later help establish Mumbai as India's financial capital.

Although the cotton boom eventually ended after the Civil War, its long-term impact remained substantial. The economic activity generated during the period contributed to the development of organised trading systems and financial markets. Over time, these developments played a role in the emergence of the Bombay Stock Exchange, which would become one of the oldest and most influential stock exchanges in Asia.

The influence of the American Civil War extended beyond economics and into constitutional thought. When independent India began drafting its Constitution in the twentieth century, American constitutional developments served as an important reference point for several Indian leaders.

Dr B. R. Ambedkar, who chaired the Drafting Committee of the Indian Constitution, examined lessons from the American experience. The Civil War had demonstrated the importance of preserving national unity and preventing secession. Ambedkar drew upon these lessons while arguing for a strong Union structure in India, ensuring that the nation would remain indivisible despite its diversity.

American constitutional principles also influenced India's commitment to equality before the law. The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, adopted after the Civil War, established important guarantees of equal protection. These ideas helped shape Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, which enshrines the fundamental right to equality.

During India's struggle for independence, however, the United States did not consistently support the nationalist movement. For much of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, Washington maintained close ties with Britain and generally avoided challenging British authority in India.

Some American leaders were openly unsympathetic to Indian aspirations for self-rule. President Theodore Roosevelt viewed British administration in India positively and praised it as a significant civilising achievement. Such views reflected broader attitudes among sections of the American political establishment at the time.

Nevertheless, the United States also provided space for Indian activists and revolutionaries. The most notable example was the Ghadar Party, which was established in San Francisco and advocated complete independence from British rule. The organisation became an important centre for anti-colonial activism among Indian expatriates and played a significant role in spreading revolutionary ideas.

American soil thus became a place where Indian nationalists could organise, publish literature, and build support for independence. Although the activities of the Ghadar movement attracted the attention of both American and British authorities, its existence demonstrated the growing intersections between the histories of the two countries.

The mood began to shift somewhat during the presidency of Woodrow Wilson. Wilson's advocacy of self-determination after the First World War inspired many anti-colonial leaders worldwide, including those in India. Although his statements were not directed specifically at India, Indian nationalists interpreted his emphasis on the rights of peoples to determine their own political future as moral support for their cause.

Several individual Americans also became deeply involved in India's freedom movement. Among the most prominent was Samuel Stokes, who later adopted the name Satyanand. Arriving in India as a missionary worker, he eventually embraced Indian culture, participated in nationalist activities, and became a supporter of Mahatma Gandhi's movement for independence.

The strongest support from an American president emerged during the administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt. While Roosevelt remained careful not to undermine Britain's war effort during the Second World War, he believed that colonialism would eventually have to end if lasting peace and international stability were to be achieved. His views often brought him into disagreement with British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, who strongly opposed Indian independence.

As the Second World War drew to a close, international attitudes toward colonialism began to change rapidly. By the mid-1940s, it had become increasingly clear that the British Empire could not maintain its control over India indefinitely.

In a significant gesture, President Harry S. Truman formally established diplomatic relations with India in November 1946, even before the country achieved full independence. When India finally became free on August 15, 1947, the United States was among the first nations to extend official recognition to the newly independent country.

Truman welcomed India's emergence as a sovereign nation and expressed hopes for friendship and cooperation between the two democracies. His message symbolised the beginning of a new chapter in relations between the countries.

The decades that followed would witness periods of cooperation, misunderstanding, disagreement, and strategic convergence. Yet the foundations of the relationship had been laid much earlier through shared encounters with British imperialism, interconnected economic developments, constitutional influences, and parallel struggles over freedom, governance, and national identity.

What began as distant and often indirect connections eventually evolved into one of the most consequential international partnerships of the modern era. The history of India and the United States demonstrates that even before formal diplomacy and strategic agreements, the trajectories of nations can become linked through events, ideas, and experiences that shape their futures in unexpected ways.


 

buttons=(Accept !) days=(20)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. Learn More
Accept !